Shanghai Sprui Navigation Lighting
Back to News
News Detail
技术指南

Solar vs Traditional Airfield Lighting: A Cost Comparison

Solar vs Traditional Airfield Lighting: A Cost Comparison

Solar airfield lighting eliminates trenching, cabling, and grid connection costs. This analysis compares total cost of ownership over 15 years between solar and traditional grid-connected airfield lighting systems.

Initial Installation Costs

Traditional grid-connected lighting systems require significant infrastructure investment including:

  • Trenching and cable installation
  • Transformer and electrical infrastructure
  • Grid connection fees
  • Labor costs for electrical work

Solar systems eliminate most of these costs, requiring only simple mounting and minimal electrical connections.

Operating Costs

Over a 15-year period, solar systems offer substantial savings:

  • Zero electricity costs
  • Minimal maintenance (battery replacement every 10-12 years)
  • No cable degradation or replacement

Total Cost of Ownership

Our analysis shows that solar airfield lighting systems can achieve 40-60% cost savings over 15 years compared to traditional grid-connected systems, making them an attractive option for airports seeking sustainable and cost-effective lighting solutions.